Cost effectiveness of mobile-source pollution control systems
Read Online

Cost effectiveness of mobile-source pollution control systems report by Ontario. Air Resources Branch.

  • 397 Want to read
  • ·
  • 63 Currently reading

Published by The Branch in [Toronto] .
Written in English

Book details:

Edition Notes

Statementprepared for Air Resources Branch ; report prepared by MacLaren Plansearch Inc.
ContributionsMacLaren Plansearch Limited.
The Physical Object
Pagination[11], 96, [4] p. :
Number of Pages96
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL17298677M
ISBN 10077296209X

Download Cost effectiveness of mobile-source pollution control systems


The Control Strategy Tool (CoST) is a client-server system and is part of EPA's Emissions Modeling Framework (EMF). The purpose of CoST is to model the emission reductions and engineering costs associated with control strategies applied to point, area, and mobile sources of air pollutant emissions to support the analyses of air pollution policies and regulations.   The report describes a computer model, developed for coking facilities, that allows the user to determine the optimum mix of pollution control devices to achieve a specified reduction in pollutant emission at the minimum annualized or capital cost. The computer program calculates and displays: the associated cost for each emission control; the total capital and annualized cost . The benefit-to-cost (B/C) ratio is determined by taking the total present value of all financial benefits of an air pollution control project and dividing it by the total present value of all the costs of the project. The present value of net benefits shows the worth of a project in terms of a present-value sum. This is a presentation of the chapter, which provides introduction and brief description of the contents of all the 3 volumes of the book on pollution control .

Cost Effective Pollution Control This informative study looks at six UK companies and examines their approach to the selection and implementation of cost-effective pollution control industry examples included in the guide describe how six companies chose cost-effective pollution control. Pollution Control – Cost-Effective Solutions This useful good practice guide deals with issues faced by industrial organisations wishing to identify and implement cost effective pollution control guide covers issues surrounding the selection of cost-effective pollution control solutions and is intended to help managers, engineers and operators save money by . Pollution Control Systems, Inc. (PCS) is a worldwide industry leader in supplying package wastewater treatment systems, related component equipment, and replacement parts. PCS offers the end user a pre-engineered and pre-fabricated method of biological wastewater treatment for domestic and some industrial wastewater applications. Tertiary Filters. A. Mobile-source air pollution is partly caused by the temporary location of the pollution sources. B. A mobile-source air polluter is only a concern to local policymakers. C. A policy to decrease mobile-source air pollution uses the same approach as a policy to decrease stationary-source air pollution. D.

The cost-effectiveness rule says that cost-effectiveness is achieved if all sources that control pollution experience the same marginal cost of reduction. In the standards approaches to regulate the environment, firms are forced to take similar shares of the pollution control burden by imposing uniform standards in both performance and : Fernando Carriazo. Pollution control is an essential task. There are four types of control: legal, social, economical, and technological measures, which help to prevent the pollution by various methods of operations. Waste products enter the environment in various forms and threaten the quality of the air, land, and water. The presence of waste products in water. COST EFFECTIVENESS ESTIMATES FOR MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION CONTROL George Miller 10 November • 'v Submitted to: Environmental Protection Agency Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control Purchase Order CDT-A REPORT NUMBER VRI EPA-3 FR (R) Vector Research, Incorporated Ann Arbor. Also contained in Table 6 is a swnmary of inspection costs, vehicle operating and time costs, and net repair costs for this alternativ e in H illsborough County. The average annual cost per vehicle would be $ and the total annual cost would be $8, 6 1 2,5